Opinion

Faculty Walkout Punishes Students Again

Published Thursday, September 24, 2009

Issue 3 / Volume 90

Enlarge this image

Ian Sander

Today, 124 UCSB professors will participate in a system-wide walkout to protest faculty pay cuts resulting from the latest round of budget cuts, with even more expressing their support for the walkout.

Like every other organization associated with the state of California, the UC has been having some trouble with finances lately. Funding from the state has fallen significantly, leaving system and campus administrators scrambling to fill a widening budget gap. In addition to raising tuition and student services, UC President Mark G. Yudof and the Regents decided to implement a policy of faculty furlough days — essentially a pay cut in the form of unpaid “days off.” Unfortunately, the nontraditional work schedule of a college professor does not lend itself to the furlough model, and much of the faculty discontent over the recent round of pay cuts stems from Yudof’s decree that professors are not allowed to take their furloughs on instructional days.

It’s not hard to see where walkout supporters are coming from — less pay for the same work doesn’t sound good to anyone. University professors are among the best educated, most highly-respected members of our society — their years of valuable experience and invaluable wisdom are certainly worth every penny they earn and more. No one is happy to see them suffer the hurt of pay cuts.

Walkout supporters claim professor no-shows on the first day of class will “spread the pain” of recent budget cuts to educate students and encourage them to be more aware of the financial crisis crushing UC. But haven’t students felt the pain of the budget crunch enough already? UC-wide tuition has increased 9 percent from last year, with the Regents eyeing massive additional increases over the course of this academic year. At UCSB, the department of Student Affairs — which covers campus services from Student Health to CLAS to the Career Center — has seen its budget cut nearly 20 percent in the past five years, with all of the cuts eventually being felt on the student level.

Academically, departments have been forced to offer fewer classes, while changes in unit-limits on GOLD will result in more crashers than ever before. With the quarter system giving time for only 20 lectures in some classes, students with selfish professors could lose over 10 percent of total class time to furlough days. Sure, we’ll still get the same grade and the same degree, but if the true point of a university education is to actually learn something, this is obviously not ideal.

Imagine the confusion and dismay of thousands of freshmen who receive e-mails from professors cancelling their first day of class. Worse, imagine the mess when enrolled students show up for class anyway, not wanting to forfeit their increasingly rare seats to would-be crashers.

Almost every American has somehow felt the effects of the current recession, and unfortunately the UC cannot afford for its faculty to be an exception. Walkout supporters decry faculty pay cuts but offer no viable alternative — would they prefer to further raise tuition, cut services or put off vital maintenance work?

When all is said and done, this walkout will hurt more than it will help. Faculty discontent over the furlough policy is understandable, but this response, as exemplified by the walkout, is selfish rather than constructive.


Reader Comments

You must Log in to comment on articles. If you don't have an account, please register new an account.

Not only faculty are discontented
Posted by hmarcuse
Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:14 AM

Many students are outraged about the service cuts and fee hikes, and realize that we ALL must do something to stop the defunding of the University. Conducting "business as usual" sends the message to legislators that we will just roll over and accept whatever cuts they impose. They have now eroded the core so far that our enterprise is compromised. The loss of today’s instruction pales in comparison to the losses already in the pipeline.

Drastic times call for drastic measures
Posted by ender2021
Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 11:18 AM

"With the quarter system giving time for only 20 lectures in some classes, students with selfish professors could lose over 10 percent of total class time to furlough days."

Here’s the problem with that statement:

"On Aug. 21, the UC executives made a slight modification to the furlough plan - no furlough days may be taken on days of instruction."

That’s a direct quote from the article "UC Employees Plot State-wide Walkout" in the Sept. 17th issue of the Nexus. Complaints about professor’s actions impacting education are valid, but please try to research a little better so as not to spread false rumors/allegations.

Furthermore, as the previous poster points out, the UC system is in a moment of crisis. Drastic actions are being taken by the Regents and the Administration, so it is appropriate for faculty and students to be taking drastic action as well. In the end, the faculty and staff of the university standing up to defend themselves and the services that are being cut will help the students, not harm them.

stan klein, Prof psychology
Posted by stanklein
Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Agree with article.

Students already suffering. If our faculty are so smart and creative perhaps they can come up with something that does not hurt the students further. Is that too much to ask? Or does the "political education" process require more students pay the price?

stan klein, Prof psychology
Posted by stanklein
Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 02:01 PM

As per the second post, a direct quote from another article in today’s paper re the Walkout:

Among the protesters’ specific demands are increasing the UC’s budgetary transparency, stopping salary cuts or furloughs for university employees earning less than $40,000 per year and mandating that six furlough days must occur on instructional dates within the academic year.

Note the last clause of the walk-out "demands". I assume these articles in today’s paper are about the wonderful walkout? Perhaps more research on your part prior to accusations of spreading false information.

It's not that you're wrong...
Posted by Miranda
Friday, September 25, 2009 at 08:35 AM

…but it’s not just about "selfish professors" decrying pay cuts. This open letter by Prof. Catherine Cole makes several nice points about why students should care more about the budget issue: http://berkeleycuts.org/?p=21.


Posted by Graduate2009
Friday, September 25, 2009 at 05:45 PM

It’s not that I think the professors are wrong in being upset about a pay cut, but seriously? Why is it fair to take even more classes away from the students who are paying (arguably) more than these classes are worth? Students pay full price for a quarter of instruction that these teachers are guaranteeing they won’t complete.

Students can only do so much. We complain excessively about the executives of bailout companies getting big bonuses, but the who’s who of UC just decided to pay $450,000/year to the chancellor of Davis on top of her free housing. That’s more than the President of the United States makes. The UC’s are a failing institution that can’t have these poor business practices. There’s too much waste. And the teachers are wasting the students time and money trying to make a point to the wrong people.

Just another example of how UCSB is a "research" institution rather than a public university.

Special Note

*Editorials are the consensus opinion of the Nexus editorial board. All editors are invited to sit on the board by the editor in chief.

Advertising